Research

Business card statistics, with the sources checked.

Five figures turn up again and again in articles about business cards and networking. We followed each one back to where it came from, opened every page on the way, and dated the lot. Here is which are verified, which are misquoted, and which nobody can trace.

None of these five business card statistics holds up the way it is usually quoted. Four are unverified: 88% of cards binned within a week, 27 million printed a day, 80% of trade show leads never followed up (credited to CEIR) and 12,000 tonnes of cards thrown away a year. We could not trace any of them to an original study with a method. One is misquoted: the 95% on face-to-face meetings, which comes from a real 2009 survey of Harvard Business Review subscribers who travel for business, paid for by an airline, and is repeated as if it covered everyone. Four other figures are verified. They are further down, one line each, ready to copy.

Unverified
88% thrown away within a week. 27 million printed a day. 80% of trade show leads never followed up. 12,000 tonnes thrown away a year.
Misquoted
95% say face-to-face meetings matter.
Verified
Ipsos on who hands cards out, Bitly on QR code scans, and two 2009 surveys on meeting in person.

Last checked . We re-check these every quarter.

By Kai, Founder of Cardr. First published .

The five, at a glance

Four unverified. One misquoted.

Each claim links to its audit below: who it is credited to, what we found at every step, and where the trail ends.

  • Verified

    We opened the original, and it says who or what was measured and when.

  • Misquoted

    The original exists, but the figure is repeated as more than it measured.

  • Unverified

    We could not trace it to an original study with a method.

Five business card statistics, checked 26 September 2026
ClaimCredited toVerdict
88% thrown away within a week Adobe, usually by way of CreditDonkey Unverified
27 million printed a day CreditDonkey, which cites Adobe; the BBC; Wikipedia Unverified
80% of trade show leads never followed up CEIR, the Center for Exhibition Industry Research Unverified
12,000 tonnes thrown away a year Aura Print, a UK print company Unverified
95% say face-to-face meetings matter Harvard Business Review Misquoted
The audit

Each figure, followed back.

Every page named here was opened on , live or as a dated Wayback Machine capture. Where a page has gone, the capture is the link, so it shows what we saw.

01 Unverified

We could not trace it to an original study with a method.

Usually credited to
Adobe, usually by way of CreditDonkey
Checked

“88% of business cards are thrown away within a week.”

What we found

The Adobe source is a post on Adobe’s blog dated 26 October 2016. It opens “This post was written by Silkcards”, with the name linked to a printing company’s website, and it gives no source for any of its four figures. CreditDonkey’s statistics page (updated 20 July 2022), the other page people cite, lists that post as its only source.

The same four figures, in the same order, were in a table on Statistic Brain, a statistics website, four years earlier. Its page as captured on 26 July 2012 lists “Percent of business cards handed out that will be thrown out in less than a week: 88%” and names three sources: CNN, BusinesscardABC and Freelance Folder. We read all three in the Wayback Machine. The 2009 CNN article gives no percentage. The 2011 Freelance Folder post, written for the printer MOO, says only “we all throw most of them away”. The nearest match for BusinesscardABC, businesscardsabc.com in 2010, says “more than 90%” are binned “the day they’re received”: a different number, with no source of its own.

Where the trail ends. At the 2012 Statistic Brain table. We found no study, survey, sample size or method behind the 88%, and none showing the opposite either, so the honest answer is that nobody knows. The full chain, hop by hop, is in our trace of the 88% figure.

If you quote itCall it what it is: an unsourced figure from a 2012 statistics website.

02 Unverified

We could not trace it to an original study with a method.

Usually credited to
CreditDonkey, which cites Adobe; the BBC; Wikipedia
Checked

“27 million business cards are printed every day.”

What we found

CreditDonkey says “27 million business cards are printed daily” and names Adobe as its only source, but the Adobe post has no printing figure in it at all. The number first appears, as far as we can find, in the same 2012 Statistic Brain table: “Number of business cards printed daily: 27,397,260”, beside “Number of cards printed in the US annually: 10 billion”. The daily figure is 10 billion divided by 365, to the card. It was worked out, not counted, and none of the three pages the table names mentions how many cards are printed.

Then it travelled. An Aura Print blog post (read in its January 2021 capture, eight months before the BBC linked to it) took “around 27 million” a day and multiplied it “by just the working days in a year” to reach 7,047,000,000. In September 2021 the BBC wrote that cards were being printed “around the world. One estimate put it at 27 million per day, or more than seven billion each year”, linking to that post. Wikipedia’s business card article now says “approximately 7 billion business cards were printed around the world every year”, in a passage that cites the BBC.

Where the trail ends. At the same 2012 table. A yearly US figure of 10 billion, with no source, became a yearly worldwide figure of about 7 billion by way of a working-days sum on a printer’s blog. We found nothing to suggest anyone has counted.

If you quote itAn unsourced 2012 estimate of 10 billion cards a year in the US, divided by 365.

03 Unverified

We could not trace it to an original study with a method.

Usually credited to
CEIR, the Center for Exhibition Industry Research
Checked

“80% of trade show leads are never followed up.”

What we found

The pages that credit CEIR do not link to a CEIR study. NeverDrop, a lead capture app, wrote on 29 January 2026 that “only 20% of trade show leads ever receive a follow-up according to the Center for Exhibition Industry Research”, and lists CEIR under “Key Sources” with no link to a report. Salesforce Training, a sales training firm, in a post dated 15 February 2012, says “statistics indicate that 80 percent of trade show exhibitors don’t follow up on their show leads”, names no source at all, and counts exhibitors rather than leads. It then describes a test of its own at one unnamed show, with no sample size, which is an anecdote rather than a study.

CEIR’s own 2019 report on this exact subject, How Exhibitors Can Improve Lead Quality and Sales Conversion (we read a copy hosted by the Pittcon exhibition), cites CEIR research three times, and none of it is a follow-up rate. An exhibit company, American Image Displays, wrote in January 2018 that “CEIR and other industry research groups have consistently disavowed that ‘fact,’ claiming that no study of theirs ever supported that conclusion.”

Where the trail ends. Short of CEIR itself. We could not find that disavowal on CEIR’s own site, which now sits inside IAEE, and its older news pages no longer load. So we cannot say CEIR has disowned the figure. We can say we found no CEIR study containing it, and one industry source that says CEIR denies it.

If you quote itDo not credit it to CEIR. There is no follow-up rate we could source, which is why our guide to following up after a networking event quotes none.

04 Unverified

We could not trace it to an original study with a method.

Usually credited to
Aura Print, a UK print company
Checked

“12,000 tonnes of business cards are thrown away every year.”

What we found

It comes from Aura Print’s blog (published 25 August 2023, updated 3 December 2025), and the page is plain that it is an estimate: “We estimate an eyewatering 12,000 tonnes of business cards are thrown away each year.” It shows no working. The same page puts a year of printed cards at 13,611 tonnes of paper, and 88% of 13,611 is 11,978, so the estimate looks like the untraceable 88% applied to that total. Further down, the same page says “1,200 tonnes of business cards estimated to be thrown away annually”, a tenth of the first figure.

It is easy to take for a UK figure, since it comes from the UK edition of the blog, and our own first notes did. It is not one. The page never says UK, the card counts it gives are the 27 million a day and the billions a year worked out from it, and the US edition carries the same sentence. Repeated elsewhere it loses the word “estimate”: PrintToBrand, in March 2026, says “Each year, around 12,000 tonnes of business cards are discarded”. On Wikipedia’s digital business card article it has become something else again: “The production of these cards requires 12,000 tonnes of paper annually.”

Where the trail ends. At one company’s estimate, with no method shown, which appears to rest on two figures that have no source. We found no measurement of business card waste, in the UK or anywhere else.

If you quote itOne print company’s own estimate: not a measurement, and not a UK figure.

05 Misquoted

The original exists, but the figure is repeated as more than it measured.

Usually credited to
Harvard Business Review
Checked

“95% of professionals say face-to-face meetings are essential to long-term business relationships.”

What we found

The number is real. It comes from a report by Harvard Business Review Analytic Services, sponsored by British Airways and published on HBR’s website on 1 September 2009. In an online survey in June 2009, it asked 2,300 Harvard Business Review subscribers about business travel, and 2,207 qualified by having taken at least one business trip in the previous three years. Its summary says: “Virtually all survey participants (95%) said that face-to-face meetings are a key factor in successfully building and maintaining long-term relationships.”

What changes as it travels is who said it. Speed Networking gives it as “95% of people”, and Novorésumé (updated 24 February 2026) as “more than 95% of professionals say that face-to-face meetings are necessary for business”, with no link. The year and the sponsor are usually dropped.

Where the trail ends. At a real report with a stated method. It is the wording that drifted: a magazine’s subscribers who travel for work became “people” and “professionals”, and a key factor in long-term relationships became “necessary for business”.

If you quote itUse the wording in the verified figures below: who was asked, when, and who paid for it.

Verified figures

Figures you can quote.

Each is one line, worded to match what its source measured, with the source in brackets. Copy the line, and link the source under it.

Verified

We opened the original, and it says who or what was measured and when. Where a source publishes no sample or method, the note under the figure says so.

  1. 23% of adults in Great Britain have ever given out a physical business card (Ipsos, online survey of 1,089 adults aged 16 to 75, 26 to 29 January 2024).

    Of those who have, 52% stopped more than four years ago, and 20% of all adults said they were interested in a digital card. It asks who hands cards out, not what happens to them afterwards.

    Ipsos, The death of the Business Card?, 26 February 2024Checked

  2. In Bitly’s own data, QR code scans grew faster than new QR codes were made: in Europe, scans rose 53% while code creation rose 7% (Bitly, The State of QR Code Scans in 2026, 10 March 2026).

    Bitly does not say how scans or its “scan rate” were measured, and the table this line quotes gives no period. The same post gives a second Europe figure, a “scan rate” up 42% from 2024 to 2025, which is a different measure, so say which one you mean. The figures cover QR codes of every kind, not business cards. For what the code on a card should hold, see QR code business cards.

    Bitly, The State of QR Code Scans in 2026, 10 March 2026Checked

  3. 95% of Harvard Business Review subscribers who travel for business said face-to-face meetings are a key factor in successfully building and maintaining long-term relationships (Harvard Business Review Analytic Services, sponsored by British Airways, online survey, June 2009).

    It surveyed 2,300 subscribers online, and 2,207 qualified by having taken a business trip in the previous three years; the 95% is of them. The sponsor is an airline, with an interest in the answer, as we have in ours.

  4. 87% of 760 business executives agreed that in-person meetings have tangible business benefits that outweigh the cost savings of web or video conferencing (Forbes Insights, Business Meetings: The Case for Face-to-Face, survey of June 2009).

    The report draws it as two bars, 46% strongly agree and 41% somewhat agree; 87% is their sum. Its other much-quoted figure, 85% who say in-person meetings “build stronger, more meaningful business relationships”, is 85% of the 84% who said they prefer meeting in person, not of everyone surveyed, so “85% of people”, as Speed Networking puts it, overstates it.

You do not need the 88% to make the case for a digital card. A paper card cannot change when your number does, and whoever receives it has to type it in by hand. A Cardr card is a QR code and an Apple Wallet pass: one scan opens your details, you can change them after you have handed it out, and it is free forever.

Create my free card
How we checked

Every citation, to where it stops.

Three verdicts, and what each one means. None of them is a guess about whether a number is true.

We started from the pages that quote each figure and followed each citation to the page it names, then that page’s citation, until the trail ran out. Where a page has gone, or refused to load for us, we read it in the Wayback Machine and link the capture. Every page we link to was opened on , and we open them all again each quarter.

We ran no survey of our own, and we have not put a number of ours in place of any of these. Where nobody has measured something, the page says so and stops.

Cardr sells digital business cards, and metal business cards with a live QR code engraved on them. A figure saying most paper cards are binned within a week suits us, which is exactly why we checked it rather than repeat it.

If you know of an earlier source, or a study with a method behind one of these figures, tell us and we will add it at the next re-check.

Verified
We opened the original, and it says who or what was measured and when. Where a source publishes no sample or method, the note under the figure says so.
Misquoted
The original exists, but the figure is repeated as more than it measured.
Unverified
We could not trace it to an original study with a method. That does not prove it false. It means nobody we could find has shown it.
Questions

Business card statistics, answered.

Is it true that 88% of business cards are thrown away within a week?

Nobody has shown it. The figure goes back to a 2012 statistics website that named three sources, and the pages we could match to all three contain no such number. The Adobe blog post it is usually credited to was written by Silkcards, whose name links to a printing company, and it cites nothing. We found no study showing the opposite either, so the honest answer is that nobody knows.

How many business cards are printed each day?

No one has counted, as far as we can find. The 27 million a day that is usually quoted is 10 billion a year divided by 365, from the same unsourced 2012 table. The 7 billion a year on Wikipedia comes, by way of the BBC, from a printer multiplying 27 million by the number of working days.

Where does the 95% face-to-face statistic come from?

From a real 2009 report by Harvard Business Review Analytic Services, sponsored by British Airways. 95% of the HBR subscribers who took part, all of whom travel for business, said face-to-face meetings are a key factor in building and maintaining long-term relationships. It is often quoted as 95% of people, which it is not.

Did CEIR find that 80% of trade show leads are never followed up?

We could not find a CEIR study that says so. The pages that credit CEIR do not link to one, CEIR’s own 2019 report on lead follow-up gives no such rate, and an exhibit company wrote in 2018 that CEIR has disavowed the figure. We could not find that disavowal on CEIR’s own site either, so our verdict is that the figure is unverified.

Which business card statistics can I trust?

The ones you can open at the organisation that measured them, with a date and, ideally, a sample and a method. Four of the figures on this page qualify: Ipsos’s 2024 survey of 1,089 adults in Great Britain, Bitly’s 2026 QR scan data, and two 2009 surveys on meeting in person, from Harvard Business Review Analytic Services and Forbes Insights. Bitly does not say how its scans were measured, so treat its figures as one company’s own data.

Can I quote or link to this page?

Yes. Each verified figure has a copy button, a link to its source and the date we opened it. Please link the original source as well, which is the point of the page. If you find a source we missed, tell us and we will add it at the next quarterly re-check.

Create my free card